Skip to main content

LAD/Blog #32: Wilson's 14 Points of Peace

I believe that these points are far too idealistic. Many of his points have not occurred yet at all, much less just in the treaty of Versailles. His points calling for public diplomacy, reducing of all armaments, the destruction of colonies, the return of Alsace-Loraine to the German people are all overextending his power, and ridiculous demands for other nations. Public diplomacy would be impossible to enforce, and would hurt nations because their enemies would know all their policies. Reducing armaments is also ridiculous because if one nation denies it (Germany) then it puts all other nations at risk. The destruction of colonies is not Wilson's decision to make because America did not have any colonies so this would severely damage European nations, while leaving America relatively unscathed. However, the most ridiculous of these claims was the return of Alsace-Loraine to the German people. This territory was both France's and Germany's main  territorial goal of WW1, and stripping France of it practically strips them of their victory entirely. Regarding his last point, the creation of the league of nations, I did think it was justified. An organization similar to it, the UN, was created and is functioning well to this day. The main problems with it were that it had no army, and the US refused to join. Had both of these occurred, I believe it would have been a successful organization.

Image result for wilson's 14 points of peace

Treaty of Versailles (went against most of Wilson's points):
Image result for treaty of versailles

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

LAD/Blog #35: Home was a Horse Stall

Executive order 9066 was essentially a racist program that excluded Japanese Americans from everyday life in America due to the actions of their former nation. They were banned from the west coast and forced into internment camps where they essentially lived under oppressive, racist marshal law. This was especially painful for first generation immigrants as they had a personal connection with both nations. Many of them did not want to see their two home nations fighting, and held some allegiance to both, but most were more prone to defending the United States.This was also hard on Japanese children, as they were ripped away from their friends, lives, and schools and taken to internment camps. One example of this is Sox, and her difficult upbringing during this time. She is taken away from her home and placed in a new one. That home is a horse stall. This stall was in a small, crowded internment camp which Sox was forced to grow up in. Her experience illustrates how poorly the Japanese ...

LAD/Blog #28: Keating-Owen Child Labor Act

The primary purpose of The Keating-Own Child Labor Act of 1916 , "To prevent interstate commerce in the products of child labor, and for other purposes." This act disallows the conduction of distribution, or commerce of products that were manufactured using child labor.   The qualification for child labor is that thirty days prior to the commerce of the product, a child under the age of 16 worked for long hours. Additionally, the Attorney General, the Secretary of Commerce, and the Secretary of Labor will form a committee that will create regulations to enforce and strengthen the act. Furthermore, officials will be continuously monitoring offices, mills, and factories to help oversee a proper workplace. Also, the state and attorney general to present all available evidence when quarries or mills or any such industry is being inspected. If child labor is discovered, there will be fines, jail sentences, and procedures for conviction. Another main point of emphasis is properly ...

LAD/Blog #19: The Dred Scott Decision

In the Scott vs. Sandford case the Supreme Court essentially ruled, "once property, always property". More specifically it ruled that an African American, free or slave, in America was not a citizen and therefore could not pursue legal matters in an American court of law. Following the ruling that Dread Scott was still considered property, this led to another connotation. The court ruled that, because the 5th amendment protected property rights, that congress did not have the power to ban slavery. As a result, Scott's plea for freedom was not heard due to his race, and slavery was re-affirmed at a federal level. This greatly increased the growing sectionalism between the south and north, even though the Missouri compromise had been repealed. These rulings were eventually overturned with the 13th, 14th, and 15th amendments. Jim Crow also lead to many racially demeaning laws being passed later on: