LAD/Blog #29: Clayton Anti-Trust Act

On October 15, 1914, the Clayton Anti-Trust Act was passed in order to strengthen the previously implemented Sherman Anti-Trust Act in order to combat the rapid formation of big businesses and monopolies. Hence, removing the anti-labor interpretation of the Sherman Anti-Trust Act. There were four main points of emphasis involved in the Act: sales, mergers, acquisitions, and price discrimination. Price discrimination meant that the price of a commodity could not be altered based on the consumer. Furthermore, the principle of Sales clarified that buyers didn't deal with the competitors of the seller. The Mergers and acquisitions ensured that no one was a director of two or more competing corporations. Ultimately, Vendors are not allowed to purchase goods and then resell them with altered prices. Corporations are not allowed to assume control of other corporations in their market with the purpose of creating a monopoly. This helped eliminate discrepancies in the Sherman Anti-Trust Act, helping combat the formation of monopolies.

Clayton Antitrust Act:
Image result for clayton antitrust act

The Sherman Antitrust Act was the predecessor to the Clayton Antitrust Act but it was not as successful:
Image result for sherman antitrust act

Comments

LAD/Blog #35: Home was a Horse Stall

Executive order 9066 was essentially a racist program that excluded Japanese Americans from everyday life in America due to the actions of their former nation. They were banned from the west coast and forced into internment camps where they essentially lived under oppressive, racist marshal law. This was especially painful for first generation immigrants as they had a personal connection with both nations. Many of them did not want to see their two home nations fighting, and held some allegiance to both, but most were more prone to defending the United States.This was also hard on Japanese children, as they were ripped away from their friends, lives, and schools and taken to internment camps. One example of this is Sox, and her difficult upbringing during this time. She is taken away from her home and placed in a new one. That home is a horse stall. This stall was in a small, crowded internment camp which Sox was forced to grow up in. Her experience illustrates how poorly the Japanese ...

LAD #37: FDR’s Executive Order 9066

On February 19th, 1942, FDR proposed executive order 9066, the order that gave the Secretary of War the ability to create designated areas for specific people to stay during wartime that could pose a threat to the US military. In WWII these areas became known as internment camps, and the people put in them were Japanese-American citizens. This allowed for the rampant mistreatment of these people with cramped living conditions and improper education. While FDR did say these areas were to be provided adequate food, shelter, and transportation, the word "adequate" is very subjective, and allowed for very poor conditions. One example of this is the story "Home was a Horse Stall", where a young girl, Sox, and her family were forced to live in a horse stall and had very little rights and no access to programs many citizens would such as a good education. I, personally, think this is a horribly executed order. While it was FDR's intention to avoid the influence of spie...

LAD #39: Brown V. Board of Education

This case marks the beginning of the civil rights movements of the late 1950s to even present day. In Brown v. Board the supreme court unanimously ruled that schools can no longer be racially segregated. This contradicted the previous ruling of 1896, in the case of Plessy v. Ferguson, that stated all publicly funded buildings could be separate but equal. This previous case had been deemed ineffective because all to often these separated facilities were not equal, with facilities that were dedicated to African Americans being significantly lower quality. This case was brought up originally because of Linda Brown, a girl barred from an all white school, and only given access to black schools which did not provide an equal education. Her defendants cited the 14th amendment, stressing that the State could not deny any person the equal right to protection of the laws, specifically the equal treatment under those laws which Linda Brown was not receiving. The Kansas District Court acknowledge...

Jack's AP American Blog

Search This Blog