Skip to main content

LAD/Blog #8: Washington's Farewell Address

Summary:
Washington created his farewell address as a signal that he would be capping his presidency at two terms, and as a thank you to the American people. Throughout the speech he remains humble and states any accomplishments he made were because of the support of the American people. He also uses this address to state his goals and worries for America to come. It serves as a both a blueprint and a thank you to the American citizens.

Warnings:

  1. The American people should not form parties because it would cause competition between the two, and would hinder progress. He felt parties had no place in a republic. 
  2. He defended his proclamation of neutrality, stating that it would be a detriment to America to become involved in foreign wars that did not concern or benefit them. 
  3. Lastly, he spoke on how he felt the government should maintain a balanced budget and not take on debt from other nations so that we can maintain power and prosperity. 


Washington's Farewell Address:
Image result for Washington's farewell address

Libertarian Party Views:
Image result for Libertarian party views

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

LAD/Blog #35: Home was a Horse Stall

Executive order 9066 was essentially a racist program that excluded Japanese Americans from everyday life in America due to the actions of their former nation. They were banned from the west coast and forced into internment camps where they essentially lived under oppressive, racist marshal law. This was especially painful for first generation immigrants as they had a personal connection with both nations. Many of them did not want to see their two home nations fighting, and held some allegiance to both, but most were more prone to defending the United States.This was also hard on Japanese children, as they were ripped away from their friends, lives, and schools and taken to internment camps. One example of this is Sox, and her difficult upbringing during this time. She is taken away from her home and placed in a new one. That home is a horse stall. This stall was in a small, crowded internment camp which Sox was forced to grow up in. Her experience illustrates how poorly the Japanese ...
Post a Comment
Read more

LAD #37: FDR’s Executive Order 9066

On February 19th, 1942, FDR proposed executive order 9066, the order that gave the Secretary of War the ability to create designated areas for specific people to stay during wartime that could pose a threat to the US military. In WWII these areas became known as internment camps, and the people put in them were Japanese-American citizens. This allowed for the rampant mistreatment of these people with cramped living conditions and improper education. While FDR did say these areas were to be provided adequate food, shelter, and transportation, the word "adequate" is very subjective, and allowed for very poor conditions. One example of this is the story "Home was a Horse Stall", where a young girl, Sox, and her family were forced to live in a horse stall and had very little rights and no access to programs many citizens would such as a good education. I, personally, think this is a horribly executed order. While it was FDR's intention to avoid the influence of spie...
Post a Comment
Read more

LAD #39: Brown V. Board of Education

This case marks the beginning of the civil rights movements of the late 1950s to even present day. In Brown v. Board the supreme court unanimously ruled that schools can no longer be racially segregated. This contradicted the previous ruling of 1896, in the case of Plessy v. Ferguson, that stated all publicly funded buildings could be separate but equal. This previous case had been deemed ineffective because all to often these separated facilities were not equal, with facilities that were dedicated to African Americans being significantly lower quality. This case was brought up originally because of Linda Brown, a girl barred from an all white school, and only given access to black schools which did not provide an equal education. Her defendants cited the 14th amendment, stressing that the State could not deny any person the equal right to protection of the laws, specifically the equal treatment under those laws which Linda Brown was not receiving. The Kansas District Court acknowledge...
Post a Comment
Read more