Skip to main content

LAD/Blog #6: Federalist Paper #10

1. What is a faction?
A faction is a natural grouping of people by ideas. Today they are commonly known in American politics as parties. While they may not always be beneficial they are natural, and the government cannot restrict them without restricting the people.

2.  Are factions good or bad? 
In my opinion, factions are very bad for the people. They create competition between factions of people attempting the same goal, to better their nation. They force people to conform to two or three possible sets of beliefs thus limiting individual thought. They allow for uneducated voters to simply vote for the faction they like. They slow progress of important bills that could better the lives of people due to competition for votes. They divide people that should be united under one flag. They foster selfishness because people stop thinking for the betterment of the nation and only think of how to garner their faction more power. Overall, I do not like factions.

3.  Why are factions so difficult to eliminate?
Factions are difficult to eliminate because they occur naturally when people's views differ from one another. To eliminate factions would be restricting peoples liberties and right to gather in groups. While eliminating factions may benefit the people you cannot restrict their rights to do so. 

4.  If factions cannot be removed then how can they be controlled?
Factions can be controlled by obtaining a large body of people. That way it is more likely that multiple factions will be formed so people can have more places to hold their views. This also means that any faction with a majority is more likely to be in the best interest of the people due to the sheer number of people that subscribe to their views. 

Image result for federalist papers

The Greek Government with no factions and a direct democracy
Image result for greek government voting plato

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

LAD/Blog #35: Home was a Horse Stall

Executive order 9066 was essentially a racist program that excluded Japanese Americans from everyday life in America due to the actions of their former nation. They were banned from the west coast and forced into internment camps where they essentially lived under oppressive, racist marshal law. This was especially painful for first generation immigrants as they had a personal connection with both nations. Many of them did not want to see their two home nations fighting, and held some allegiance to both, but most were more prone to defending the United States.This was also hard on Japanese children, as they were ripped away from their friends, lives, and schools and taken to internment camps. One example of this is Sox, and her difficult upbringing during this time. She is taken away from her home and placed in a new one. That home is a horse stall. This stall was in a small, crowded internment camp which Sox was forced to grow up in. Her experience illustrates how poorly the Japanese ...

LAD #37: FDR’s Executive Order 9066

On February 19th, 1942, FDR proposed executive order 9066, the order that gave the Secretary of War the ability to create designated areas for specific people to stay during wartime that could pose a threat to the US military. In WWII these areas became known as internment camps, and the people put in them were Japanese-American citizens. This allowed for the rampant mistreatment of these people with cramped living conditions and improper education. While FDR did say these areas were to be provided adequate food, shelter, and transportation, the word "adequate" is very subjective, and allowed for very poor conditions. One example of this is the story "Home was a Horse Stall", where a young girl, Sox, and her family were forced to live in a horse stall and had very little rights and no access to programs many citizens would such as a good education. I, personally, think this is a horribly executed order. While it was FDR's intention to avoid the influence of spie...

LAD #39: Brown V. Board of Education

This case marks the beginning of the civil rights movements of the late 1950s to even present day. In Brown v. Board the supreme court unanimously ruled that schools can no longer be racially segregated. This contradicted the previous ruling of 1896, in the case of Plessy v. Ferguson, that stated all publicly funded buildings could be separate but equal. This previous case had been deemed ineffective because all to often these separated facilities were not equal, with facilities that were dedicated to African Americans being significantly lower quality. This case was brought up originally because of Linda Brown, a girl barred from an all white school, and only given access to black schools which did not provide an equal education. Her defendants cited the 14th amendment, stressing that the State could not deny any person the equal right to protection of the laws, specifically the equal treatment under those laws which Linda Brown was not receiving. The Kansas District Court acknowledge...