Skip to main content

LAD/Blog #2: Peter Zenger

1.)    Who was Peter Zenger?

John Peter Zinger was a German immigrant who wrote for the New York Weekly Journal, and was not a huge fan of Governor Crosby. He was eventually arrested for his stance on the governor, on charges of Seditious Libel and rebellious tendencies.

2.)   What was the controversy over his charges?

The controversy was that for Seditious Libel to be charged the statements that one makes condemning another need to be false, however the comments made by Zenger were all true. Despite the fact that he did publish the articles, and did criticize Governor Crosby, he only stated true facts so it was not a crime. This coupled with the judge's biases against him and previous incrimination in 1734 made for a very controversial trial. 

3.)   What influence did his case have on American governmental tradition?

The main influence on the American government came in the form of the first amendment. After the trial the American population was strongly in favor of Zenger, and as a result the American government passed an amendment granting free speech to all citizens, and making Seditious Libel not a crime anymore.

4.)   What is the lasting significance of his trial?

This trial opened the door for freedom of speech in America. This opened the door for staples of American society, such as freedom of the press, social media, and blogs like this one. Because of this trial freedom of speech has become a staple of American democracy. 

Peter Zenger:
Image result for peter zenger

First Amendment:
Image result for first amendment

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

LAD/Blog #35: Home was a Horse Stall

Executive order 9066 was essentially a racist program that excluded Japanese Americans from everyday life in America due to the actions of their former nation. They were banned from the west coast and forced into internment camps where they essentially lived under oppressive, racist marshal law. This was especially painful for first generation immigrants as they had a personal connection with both nations. Many of them did not want to see their two home nations fighting, and held some allegiance to both, but most were more prone to defending the United States.This was also hard on Japanese children, as they were ripped away from their friends, lives, and schools and taken to internment camps. One example of this is Sox, and her difficult upbringing during this time. She is taken away from her home and placed in a new one. That home is a horse stall. This stall was in a small, crowded internment camp which Sox was forced to grow up in. Her experience illustrates how poorly the Japanese ...

LAD/Blog #28: Keating-Owen Child Labor Act

The primary purpose of The Keating-Own Child Labor Act of 1916 , "To prevent interstate commerce in the products of child labor, and for other purposes." This act disallows the conduction of distribution, or commerce of products that were manufactured using child labor.   The qualification for child labor is that thirty days prior to the commerce of the product, a child under the age of 16 worked for long hours. Additionally, the Attorney General, the Secretary of Commerce, and the Secretary of Labor will form a committee that will create regulations to enforce and strengthen the act. Furthermore, officials will be continuously monitoring offices, mills, and factories to help oversee a proper workplace. Also, the state and attorney general to present all available evidence when quarries or mills or any such industry is being inspected. If child labor is discovered, there will be fines, jail sentences, and procedures for conviction. Another main point of emphasis is properly ...

LAD/Blog #25: The Dawes Act

The Dawes Act greatly improved the land distribution among Indians in the US. Prior to 1887 Indian Reservations were held in a trust set up by the US government, and the Indians were allowed to live there, but not to own the land. However, with the Dawes Act this land was given to individual tribesmen based on age, gender, and status. While it was better than the situation before, this act was not without its faults. It still preserved the US government's right to build infrastructure on these lands that were not their's. It excluded the 5 civilized tribes, the Cherokee, Chickasaw, Choctaw, Creek, and Seminole. Also, it encourage the Indians to sell their land to American settlers. Despite this it was still a step up because now the Indians owned the land. They were also given a path to citizenship with this act, where 25 years after owning land, they would be able to reap the benefits to citizenship such as education and legal protection. With that said, many Indians did not l...